LEE v. WARDEN, NOBLE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, 2:13-cv-761. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20140805a28
Visitors: 20
Filed: Aug. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 04, 2014
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER MICHAEL H. WATSON, District Judge. On May 15, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 be denied and that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 14. Although the parties were informed of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Re
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER MICHAEL H. WATSON, District Judge. On May 15, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 be denied and that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 14. Although the parties were informed of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Rec..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
MICHAEL H. WATSON, District Judge.
On May 15, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be denied and that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 14. Although the parties were informed of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed.
Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 14, is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
