Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hale v. U.S., 3:13-cr-00280-MOC-1. (2018)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20181205c10 Visitors: 21
Filed: Dec. 04, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 04, 2018
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on its own motion following the filing of the Government's Response to Petitioner's pro se Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255. (Doc. No. 4.) In accordance with the principles articulated in Roseboro v. Garrison , 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), the Court notifies Petitioner that he has a right to reply to the Government's Response. Failure to reply may result in denial of
More

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on its own motion following the filing of the Government's Response to Petitioner's pro se Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (Doc. No. 4.) In accordance with the principles articulated in Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), the Court notifies Petitioner that he has a right to reply to the Government's Response. Failure to reply may result in denial of Petitioner's § 2255 Motion to Vacate without further notice.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from entrance of this Order to reply to the Government's Response.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer