GOUVEAL v. SSC CHARLOTTE OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, 3:11-CV-559-FDW-DCK. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20120112977
Visitors: 32
Filed: Jan. 10, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 10, 2012
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Defendant SSC Charlotte Operating Company, LLC's "Consent Motion To Stay Proceedings" (Document No. 8) filed December 27, 2011. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, and the record, and in consultation with Judge Whitney's chambers, the undersigned will deny the motion. IT IS, THE
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Defendant SSC Charlotte Operating Company, LLC's "Consent Motion To Stay Proceedings" (Document No. 8) filed December 27, 2011. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, and the record, and in consultation with Judge Whitney's chambers, the undersigned will deny the motion. IT IS, THER..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Defendant SSC Charlotte Operating Company, LLC's "Consent Motion To Stay Proceedings" (Document No. 8) filed December 27, 2011. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, and the record, and in consultation with Judge Whitney's chambers, the undersigned will deny the motion.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendant SSC Charlotte Operating Company, LLC's "Consent Motion To Stay Proceedings" (Document No. 8) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
