U.S. v. SMITH, 2:14-CR-094. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20140625g10
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jun. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 24, 2014
Summary: ORDER GEORGE C. SMITH, District Judge. On May 20, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant Smith's guilty plea to Count One of the Information charging him with fraudulent use of one or more unauthorized access devices in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1029(a)(2). Defendant, represented by counsel, waived his right to appear on the matter before a District Judge. The Magistrate Judge conducted the c
Summary: ORDER GEORGE C. SMITH, District Judge. On May 20, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant Smith's guilty plea to Count One of the Information charging him with fraudulent use of one or more unauthorized access devices in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1029(a)(2). Defendant, represented by counsel, waived his right to appear on the matter before a District Judge. The Magistrate Judge conducted the co..
More
ORDER
GEORGE C. SMITH, District Judge.
On May 20, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant Smith's guilty plea to Count One of the Information charging him with fraudulent use of one or more unauthorized access devices in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(2). Defendant, represented by counsel, waived his right to appear on the matter before a District Judge. The Magistrate Judge conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Defendant's plea was knowing, voluntary, free from coercion, and had a basis in fact.
Defendant was specifically informed of his right to contest the Report and Recommendation by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did not file any objections.
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS Defendant's plea of guilty to Count One of the Information. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of fraudulent use of one or more unauthorized access devices.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
