Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

RUTHERFORD v. WARDEN, SOUTHERN OHIO CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, 1:15cv164. (2015)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20150824a32 Visitors: 3
Filed: Aug. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 21, 2015
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL R. BARRETT , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on June 15, 2015 (Doc. 20). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Re
More

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on June 15, 2015 (Doc. 20).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 20) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED consistent with the Recommendation by the Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint (Doc. 7) is denied to the extent set forth in the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 20).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer