Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Hughes v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, 5:19-CV-00011. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. Ohio Number: infdco20191011j89 Visitors: 14
Filed: Oct. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 07, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT ENTRY BENJAMIN H. SETTLE , District Judge . For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion filed contemporaneously herewith, DBNTC's motion to dismiss for insufficient service of process (Doc. No. 8) is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs' claims against DBNTC are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DBNTC's motion to dismiss based on its joinder in the Ocwen Parties' motion to dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT. The Ocwen Parties' motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 7) is GRANTED, except Plaintiffs' quiettitle cla
More

JUDGMENT ENTRY

For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion filed contemporaneously herewith, DBNTC's motion to dismiss for insufficient service of process (Doc. No. 8) is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs' claims against DBNTC are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. DBNTC's motion to dismiss based on its joinder in the Ocwen Parties' motion to dismiss is DENIED AS MOOT.

The Ocwen Parties' motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 7) is GRANTED, except Plaintiffs' quiettitle claim (Count 9) is REMANDED to state court. Counts 1-8 and 10 against Homeward, MERS, and Ocwen are either barred by the doctrine of res judicata or time-barred by the statute of limitations and are therefore DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs' FDCPA and CSPA claims against Mr. Berkeley are likewise time-barred and are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, while Plaintiffs' remaining claims against Mr. Berkeley are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE based on Plaintiffs' failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer