PARTIN v. WELTMAN WEINBERG & REIS CO., LPA, 1:14cv216. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20160208955
Visitors: 12
Filed: Feb. 05, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2016
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT , District Judge . This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on January 5, 2016 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 42). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT , District Judge . This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on January 5, 2016 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 42). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc...
More
ORDER
SUSAN J. DLOTT, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings and filed with this Court on January 5, 2016 a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 42). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 43), defendant filed a response to the objections (Doc. 44) plaintiff filed a reply to the response (Doc. 45).
The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 25) is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
