UMELO v. RHA HEALTH SERVICES, 5:11-CV-440-F. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20120130658
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jan. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 26, 2012
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. FOX, Senior District Judge. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to designate the plaintiffs Response [DE-13] as an Amendment to the Complaint, see [DE-I], Exh. 4. The court has carefully considered the material contained in and attached to the Amended Complaint [DE-13]. However, for the reasons cogently set forth in the Memorandum [DE-IS] thereto, the defendant's uncontested Motion to Dismiss [DE-14] is ALLOWED and this action is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to so not
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. FOX, Senior District Judge. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to designate the plaintiffs Response [DE-13] as an Amendment to the Complaint, see [DE-I], Exh. 4. The court has carefully considered the material contained in and attached to the Amended Complaint [DE-13]. However, for the reasons cogently set forth in the Memorandum [DE-IS] thereto, the defendant's uncontested Motion to Dismiss [DE-14] is ALLOWED and this action is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to so noti..
More
ORDER
JAMES C. FOX, Senior District Judge.
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to designate the plaintiffs Response [DE-13] as an Amendment to the Complaint, see [DE-I], Exh. 4. The court has carefully considered the material contained in and attached to the Amended Complaint [DE-13]. However, for the reasons cogently set forth in the Memorandum [DE-IS] thereto, the defendant's uncontested Motion to Dismiss [DE-14] is ALLOWED and this action is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to so notify the plaintiff and to close this case.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
