STROUD v. GASTON COUNTY, 3:13CV684-MOC-DSC. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20140424b14
Visitors: 22
Filed: Apr. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 22, 2014
Summary: ORDER DAVID S. CAYER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on "Plaintiff's Response ... to ... April 3, 2014 Order" (document #10). Plaintiff seeks a thirty-day extension of time in which to respond to the "12(b) Motions to Dismiss of Gaston County ..." (document #7) filed on April 3, 2014. In accordance with Roseboro v. Garrison , 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), the Court advises Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se , that he has a right to respond to Defendants' Motion. The
Summary: ORDER DAVID S. CAYER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on "Plaintiff's Response ... to ... April 3, 2014 Order" (document #10). Plaintiff seeks a thirty-day extension of time in which to respond to the "12(b) Motions to Dismiss of Gaston County ..." (document #7) filed on April 3, 2014. In accordance with Roseboro v. Garrison , 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), the Court advises Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se , that he has a right to respond to Defendants' Motion. The C..
More
ORDER
DAVID S. CAYER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on "Plaintiff's Response ... to ... April 3, 2014 Order" (document #10). Plaintiff seeks a thirty-day extension of time in which to respond to the "12(b) Motions to Dismiss of Gaston County ..." (document #7) filed on April 3, 2014.
In accordance with Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), the Court advises Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, that he has a right to respond to Defendants' Motion. The Court also advises Plaintiff that failure to respond may result in Defendants being granted the relief they seek, that is, the DISMISSAL OF THE COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff is allowed until June 2, 2014 to respond to Defendants' "Motion to Dismiss" (document #7). Plaintiff is cautioned that there will be no further extensions of this deadline absent exceptional circumstances.
To the extent that "Plaintiff's Response ... to April 3, 2014 Order" (document #10) seeks early discovery or any other relief, it is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
