SHARON L. OVINGTON, Magistrate Judge.
This case came before the Court for a plea hearing on November 4, 2018. Assistant United States Attorney Brent Tabacchi appeared and represented the Government, and Tamara Sack appeared and represented Defendant. Defendant was present with counsel.
Prior to the hearing, the parties entered into a proposed binding plea agreement pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(C), which agreement has been filed of record. (Doc. #17). Under the terms of the plea agreement, Defendant agreed to plead guilty as charged in the Indictment currently pending against him, which charges him with Possession with Intent to Distribute 500 grams or more of Cocaine in violation of Title 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B).
During the plea hearing, the undersigned had the opportunity to address Defendant in open court and to inform Defendant of all rights and privileges as set forth in Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(b)(1). Further, the undersigned carefully inquired of Defendant regarding his understanding of the agreement, as well as his competence to understand the agreement. Having fully inquired, the undersigned Judicial Officer finds that Defendant's tendered plea of guilty as charged in the Indictment was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. Additionally, based upon the statement of facts, which were read into the record and affirmed by Defendant, the undersigned finds that there is a sufficient factual basis for finding that Defendant is in fact guilty of Possession with Intent to Distribute 500 grams or more of Cocaine in violation of Title 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B).
Based upon the foregoing, it is
Pending the Court's acceptance of Defendant's guilty plea, Defendant has been referred to the Probation Department for a pre-sentence investigation and report.
Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(b)(2), any party may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations within
Failure to make objections in accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).