U.S. v. SIMCOX, 2:11-cr-298. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20120215974
Visitors: 12
Filed: Feb. 14, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 14, 2012
Summary: ORDER GEORGE C. SMITH, District Judge. On January 20, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant Simcox's guilty plea to Count One of the Information charging him with engaging in a monetary transaction affecting a financial institution in criminally derived property valued at greater than $10,000, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1957. Defendant, represented by counsel, waived his right to appear on
Summary: ORDER GEORGE C. SMITH, District Judge. On January 20, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant Simcox's guilty plea to Count One of the Information charging him with engaging in a monetary transaction affecting a financial institution in criminally derived property valued at greater than $10,000, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1957. Defendant, represented by counsel, waived his right to appear on ..
More
ORDER
GEORGE C. SMITH, District Judge.
On January 20, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant Simcox's guilty plea to Count One of the Information charging him with engaging in a monetary transaction affecting a financial institution in criminally derived property valued at greater than $10,000, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1957. Defendant, represented by counsel, waived his right to appear on the matter before a District Judge. The Magistrate Judge conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Defendant's plea was knowing, voluntary, free from coercion, and had a basis in fact.
Defendant was specifically informed of his right to contest the Report and Recommendation by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did not file any objections.
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS Defendant's plea of guilty to Count One of the Information. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of engaging in a monetary transaction affecting a financial institution in criminally derived property valued at greater than $10,000.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
