JEFFERSON v. WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, 2:14-CV-736. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20150121b20
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 20, 2015
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER JAMES L. GRAHAM, District Judge. On December 18, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 be denied and that this action be dismissed. ECF 6. Although the parties were advised of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendatio
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER JAMES L. GRAHAM, District Judge. On December 18, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 be denied and that this action be dismissed. ECF 6. Although the parties were advised of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES L. GRAHAM, District Judge.
On December 18, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be denied and that this action be dismissed. ECF 6. Although the parties were advised of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed.
The Report and Recommendation, ECF 6, is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus, ECF 1, is DENIED, and this action is hereby DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
