Peck v. Nevada ex rel. Department of Corrections, 2:18-cv-00237-APG-VCF. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190605a77
Visitors: 8
Filed: May 22, 2019
Latest Update: May 22, 2019
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S ORDERS [ECF Nos. 61, 63, 66] ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Ferenbach entered two Orders denying plaintiff Frank Peck's motion under the Americans with Disabilities Act. ECF Nos. 61, 63. Mr. Peck objected to the orders. ECF No. 66. The defendants responded to Mr. Peck's objection. ECF No. 71. 1 I have reviewed Judge Ferenbach's Orders and the related papers. I find that Judge Ferenbach's Orders are not "clearly erroneous or contrar
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S ORDERS [ECF Nos. 61, 63, 66] ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Ferenbach entered two Orders denying plaintiff Frank Peck's motion under the Americans with Disabilities Act. ECF Nos. 61, 63. Mr. Peck objected to the orders. ECF No. 66. The defendants responded to Mr. Peck's objection. ECF No. 71. 1 I have reviewed Judge Ferenbach's Orders and the related papers. I find that Judge Ferenbach's Orders are not "clearly erroneous or contrary..
More
ORDER AFFIRMING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S ORDERS
[ECF Nos. 61, 63, 66]
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Ferenbach entered two Orders denying plaintiff Frank Peck's motion under the Americans with Disabilities Act. ECF Nos. 61, 63. Mr. Peck objected to the orders. ECF No. 66. The defendants responded to Mr. Peck's objection. ECF No. 71.1
I have reviewed Judge Ferenbach's Orders and the related papers. I find that Judge Ferenbach's Orders are not "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Local Rule IB 3-1(a). Therefore, Magistrate Judge Ferenbach's Orders (ECF Nos. 61, 63) are affirmed in their entirety, and Mr. Peck's Objection (ECF No. 66) is overruled.
FootNotes
1. Mr. Peck also filed a reply in support of his objection. ECF No. 80. Such replies are allowed only with leave of court. See Local Rule IB 3-1(a). I did not grant Mr. Peck leave to file a reply. Nevertheless, I have reviewed Mr. Peck's reply and it does not change my decision.
Source: Leagle
