TIBBETTS v. WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, 1:14-cv-602. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20151029f95
Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 28, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 28, 2015
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS SUSAN J. DLOTT , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz(ECF No. 31), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, Warden's Renewed Motion to Dismiss in Light of Glossi
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS SUSAN J. DLOTT , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz(ECF No. 31), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, Warden's Renewed Motion to Dismiss in Light of Glossip..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
SUSAN J. DLOTT, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz(ECF No. 31), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.
Accordingly, Warden's Renewed Motion to Dismiss in Light of Glossip v. Gross (ECF No. 22) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
