Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gray v. Perritt, 1:18CV997. (2020)

Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20200320924 Visitors: 26
Filed: Mar. 19, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 19, 2020
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. SCHROEDER , District Judge . On February 5, 2020, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on Petitioner pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. Petitioner filed objections (Doc. 16) to the Recommendation within the time limit prescribed by Section 636. The court has reviewed Petitioner's objections de novo and finds they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc. 14), which is affirmed and ado
More

ORDER

On February 5, 2020, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on Petitioner pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Petitioner filed objections (Doc. 16) to the Recommendation within the time limit prescribed by Section 636.

The court has reviewed Petitioner's objections de novo and finds they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc. 14), which is affirmed and adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 4) is GRANTED, that the Petition (Doc. 1) is DENIED, that this action is DISMISSED, and that there being neither a substantial issue for appeal concerning the denial of a constitutional right affecting the conviction nor a debatable procedural ruling, a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer