Brown v. McCafferty, 18-1126. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20200225d28
Visitors: 28
Filed: Feb. 24, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 24, 2020
Summary: ORDER GERALD J. PAPPERT , District Judge . AND NOW, this 24th day February, 2020, upon consideration of Defendants' Unopposed Motion in Limine (ECF No. 87), Plaintiff's Motion in Limine (ECF No. 88) and Defendants' Response (ECF No. 90), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' Motion (ECF No. 87) is GRANTED ; 2. Plaintiff's Motion (ECF No. 88) is DENIED ; and 3. Defendants may impeach the Plaintiff's character for truthfulness with evidence of his prior convictions consistent
Summary: ORDER GERALD J. PAPPERT , District Judge . AND NOW, this 24th day February, 2020, upon consideration of Defendants' Unopposed Motion in Limine (ECF No. 87), Plaintiff's Motion in Limine (ECF No. 88) and Defendants' Response (ECF No. 90), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' Motion (ECF No. 87) is GRANTED ; 2. Plaintiff's Motion (ECF No. 88) is DENIED ; and 3. Defendants may impeach the Plaintiff's character for truthfulness with evidence of his prior convictions consistent ..
More
ORDER
GERALD J. PAPPERT, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 24th day February, 2020, upon consideration of Defendants' Unopposed Motion in Limine (ECF No. 87), Plaintiff's Motion in Limine (ECF No. 88) and Defendants' Response (ECF No. 90), it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Defendants' Motion (ECF No. 87) is GRANTED;
2. Plaintiff's Motion (ECF No. 88) is DENIED; and
3. Defendants may impeach the Plaintiff's character for truthfulness with evidence of his prior convictions consistent with Federal Rule of Evidence 609(a)(1)(A). Defendants may also introduce evidence of Plaintiff's aggravated assault and burglary convictions under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) for the limited purpose of establishing motive.
Source: Leagle
