McCLARY v. SEARLES, 15-7998. (2016)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20160527077
Visitors: 10
Filed: May 27, 2016
Latest Update: May 27, 2016
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM : Ronald McClary appeals the district court's order and judgment dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McClary v. Searles, No. 3:15-cv-00077-FDW (W.D.N.C. Nov. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ad
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM : Ronald McClary appeals the district court's order and judgment dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McClary v. Searles, No. 3:15-cv-00077-FDW (W.D.N.C. Nov. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ronald McClary appeals the district court's order and judgment dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McClary v. Searles, No. 3:15-cv-00077-FDW (W.D.N.C. Nov. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
