Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Holdbrooks v. Warden, Correctional Reception Center, 1:18cv183. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20190211588 Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 06, 2019
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on January 15, 2019 (Doc. 7), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired January 29, 2019, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, respondent's motion to dismiss (Doc.
More

ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on January 15, 2019 (Doc. 7), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired January 29, 2019, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, respondent's motion to dismiss (Doc. 6) is GRANTED and petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254 (Doc. 3) is DISMISSED without prejudice to refiling after petitioner exhausts his state court remedies.

A certificate of appealability will not issue under the standard set forth in Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484-85 (2000), because "jurists of reason" will not find it debatable whether this Court is correct in its procedural ruling that petitioner has failed to exhaust state court remedies and that this case is dismissed without prejudice pending his exhaustion of such remedies.

With respect to any application by petitioner to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1815(a)(3) that an appeal of any Order adopting the Report and Recommendation will be not be taken in "good faith," and therefore petitioner is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a); Kincade v. Sparkman, 117 F.3d 949, 952 (6th Cir. 1997).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer