White v. Robinson, 3:85-cv-025. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20190130804
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jan. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 24, 2019
Summary: RECOMMITTAL ORDER WALTER H. RICE , District Judge . This case is before the Court on Petitioner's Objections (ECF No. 64) to the Magistrate Judge's Order (ECF No. 61) transferring Petitioner's Motion to Revive and Enforce the 1991 Judgment (ECF No. 54). The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby re
Summary: RECOMMITTAL ORDER WALTER H. RICE , District Judge . This case is before the Court on Petitioner's Objections (ECF No. 64) to the Magistrate Judge's Order (ECF No. 61) transferring Petitioner's Motion to Revive and Enforce the 1991 Judgment (ECF No. 54). The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby ret..
More
RECOMMITTAL ORDER
WALTER H. RICE, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on Petitioner's Objections (ECF No. 64) to the Magistrate Judge's Order (ECF No. 61) transferring Petitioner's Motion to Revive and Enforce the 1991 Judgment (ECF No. 54).
The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with instructions to file a supplemental report analyzing the Objections and making recommendations based on that analysis.
Source: Leagle
