U.S. v. PENDERGRASS, 2:14-cr-21. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20150303c29
Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2015
Summary: ORDER GEORGE C. SMITH , District Judge . On January 26, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant's guilty plea to the Indictment charging him in Counts 31 and 48 with bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1344. Defendant, represented by counsel, waived his right to appear on the matter before a District Judge. The Magistrate Judge conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the Federal R
Summary: ORDER GEORGE C. SMITH , District Judge . On January 26, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant's guilty plea to the Indictment charging him in Counts 31 and 48 with bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1344. Defendant, represented by counsel, waived his right to appear on the matter before a District Judge. The Magistrate Judge conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the Federal Ru..
More
ORDER
GEORGE C. SMITH, District Judge.
On January 26, 2015, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that the Court accept Defendant's guilty plea to the Indictment charging him in Counts 31 and 48 with bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1344.
Defendant, represented by counsel, waived his right to appear on the matter before a District Judge. The Magistrate Judge conducted the colloquy required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Defendant's plea was knowing, voluntary, free from coercion, and had a basis in fact.
Defendant was specifically informed of his right to contest the Report and Recommendation by filing any objections within 14 days of the issuance of the Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant did not file any objections.
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and ACCEPTS Defendant's plea of guilty to Counts 31 and 48 of the Indictment. Defendant is hereby adjudged guilty of bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1344.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
