Ohio ex rel. Marcum v. Duchak, 3:17-cv-437. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20180220895
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2018
Summary: RECOMMITTAL ORDER WALTER H. RICE , District Judge . This case is before the Court on Petitioner's Objections (ECF No. 21) to the Magistrate Judge's Reports and Recommendations (ECF Nos. 16 & 17) and Order (ECF No. 19). The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with
Summary: RECOMMITTAL ORDER WALTER H. RICE , District Judge . This case is before the Court on Petitioner's Objections (ECF No. 21) to the Magistrate Judge's Reports and Recommendations (ECF Nos. 16 & 17) and Order (ECF No. 19). The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with ..
More
RECOMMITTAL ORDER
WALTER H. RICE, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on Petitioner's Objections (ECF No. 21) to the Magistrate Judge's Reports and Recommendations (ECF Nos. 16 & 17) and Order (ECF No. 19).
The District Judge has preliminarily considered the Objections and believes they will be more appropriately resolved after further analysis by the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), this matter is hereby returned to the Magistrate Judge with instructions to file a supplemental report analyzing the Objections and making recommendations based on that analysis.
Source: Leagle
