SMITH v. WARDEN, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, 3:13-cv-330. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20140626c93
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 25, 2014
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #13), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. It is hereby ORDERED that the Respondent's Motion to Dism
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #13), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations. It is hereby ORDERED that the Respondent's Motion to Dismi..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THOMAS M. ROSE, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #13), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.
It is hereby ORDERED that the Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 5) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
