Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DAVIDSON v. WARDEN, MANSFIELD CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, 2:14-cv-115. (2015)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20151006b24 Visitors: 11
Filed: Oct. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 02, 2015
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL H. WATSON , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Deavers issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") in this pro se habeas corpus case, recommending that this action be dismissed as barred by the one-year statute of limitations pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2244(d). R&R, ECF No. 16. Magistrate Judge Deavers notified the parties of their right to file objections to the R&R pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Id. at 7-8. Magistrate Judge Deav
More

ORDER

Magistrate Judge Deavers issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") in this pro se habeas corpus case, recommending that this action be dismissed as barred by the one-year statute of limitations pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). R&R, ECF No. 16.

Magistrate Judge Deavers notified the parties of their right to file objections to the R&R pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Id. at 7-8. Magistrate Judge Deavers further specifically advised the parties that the failure to object to the R&R within fourteen days would result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge as well as a waiver of the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the R&R. Id. The deadline for filing such objections has passed, and no objections were filed.

Having received no objections, the R&R, ECF No. 16, is ADOPTED and the Court hereby DISMISSES this petition for a writ of habeas corpus as time-barred. The clerk shall terminate this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer