YARBOROUGH v. SAPPINGTON, 13-6530. (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20130926172
Visitors: 20
Filed: Sep. 26, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 26, 2013
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Following a bench trial on the remaining claims in Jesse Yarborough's civil rights action, which was filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), the district court entered judgment in favor of Defendants. We have reviewed Yarborough's claims on appeal in conjunction with the record, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Following a bench trial on the remaining claims in Jesse Yarborough's civil rights action, which was filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), the district court entered judgment in favor of Defendants. We have reviewed Yarborough's claims on appeal in conjunction with the record, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Following a bench trial on the remaining claims in Jesse Yarborough's civil rights action, which was filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), the district court entered judgment in favor of Defendants. We have reviewed Yarborough's claims on appeal in conjunction with the record, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Yarborough v. Sappington, No. 5:09-ct-03083-D (E.D.N.C. Mar. 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
