Martin v. Garrett, 1:17-cv-350-MOC-WCM. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20190904883
Visitors: 9
Filed: Sep. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 03, 2019
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court following receipt of a tolling agreement at issue in this case submitted by Defendant Wally Wazan following a hearing by this Court. (Doc. No. 58-1). Before ruling on Defendant's motion to dismiss, the Court shall give the parties ten days from entry of this Order in which to brief the issue of the legal effect of the tolling agreement as to Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Wally Wazan in his individual capac
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, JR. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court following receipt of a tolling agreement at issue in this case submitted by Defendant Wally Wazan following a hearing by this Court. (Doc. No. 58-1). Before ruling on Defendant's motion to dismiss, the Court shall give the parties ten days from entry of this Order in which to brief the issue of the legal effect of the tolling agreement as to Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Wally Wazan in his individual capaci..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, JR., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court following receipt of a tolling agreement at issue in this case submitted by Defendant Wally Wazan following a hearing by this Court. (Doc. No. 58-1). Before ruling on Defendant's motion to dismiss, the Court shall give the parties ten days from entry of this Order in which to brief the issue of the legal effect of the tolling agreement as to Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Wally Wazan in his individual capacity, including through submission of an affidavit by Wazan attesting to his knowledge or lack thereof of the tolling agreement when it was entered.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
