Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SUN TRUST BANK, INC. v. SLOAN DRUMMONDS, INC., 7:11-CV-83-F. (2012)

Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20120514740 Visitors: 4
Filed: May 11, 2012
Latest Update: May 11, 2012
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. FOX, District Judge. This matter is before the court on the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal [DE-37] filed by Plaintiff Sun Trust Banks, Inc., and Defendants Crystal Drummonds and Bayview Motors and Commercial Trucks, Inc. In the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal, Sun Trust, Crystal Drummonds, and Bayview ask the court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a)(l), to issue an order dismissing the case in its entirety without prejudice. Rule 41 (a)(1) provides that "a plain
More

ORDER

JAMES C. FOX, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal [DE-37] filed by Plaintiff Sun Trust Banks, Inc., and Defendants Crystal Drummonds and Bayview Motors and Commercial Trucks, Inc. In the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal, Sun Trust, Crystal Drummonds, and Bayview ask the court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a)(l), to issue an order dismissing the case in its entirety without prejudice.

Rule 41 (a)(1) provides that "a plaintiff may file an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." FED.R.CIV.P.41(a)(1)(A). Accordingly, if Crystal Drummonds and Bayview are considered the only parties to have "appeared" in this action, then a court order is unnecessary.

Three other parties, however, joined in the removal of this action to this court: Sloan Drummonds, Inc., Worthmore Financial, Inc., and Sloan Drummonds, individually. See Notice of Removal [DE-1]. The court has since made an entry of default as to these parties. See Entry of Default [DE-21]. Nevertheless, to the extent that filing of the Notice of Removal constitutes an appearance in this action, the court construes the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal as a Motion for Voluntary Dismissal under Rule 41 (a)(2). The unopposed motion is ALLOWED, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer