Martin v. Harrah's NC Casino Company, 1:19-CV-185-MR-DCK. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20190809d17
Visitors: 15
Filed: Aug. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 08, 2019
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on "Plaintiff's Motion to Stay" (Document No. 12) filed July 5, 2019. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, and in consultation with Judge Reidinger's chambers, the undersigned will deny the motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that "Plaintiff's Motion to Stay" (Do
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on "Plaintiff's Motion to Stay" (Document No. 12) filed July 5, 2019. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, and in consultation with Judge Reidinger's chambers, the undersigned will deny the motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that "Plaintiff's Motion to Stay" (Doc..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on "Plaintiff's Motion to Stay" (Document No. 12) filed July 5, 2019. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, and in consultation with Judge Reidinger's chambers, the undersigned will deny the motion.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that "Plaintiff's Motion to Stay" (Document No. 12) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
