U.S. v. MOBLEY, 12-7481. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20121218151
Visitors: 23
Filed: Dec. 18, 2012
Latest Update: Dec. 18, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Eddie Mobley appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mobley, No. 3:92-cr-00018-MOC-15 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 16, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Eddie Mobley appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mobley, No. 3:92-cr-00018-MOC-15 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 16, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adeq..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Eddie Mobley appeals the district court's order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mobley, No. 3:92-cr-00018-MOC-15 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 16, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
