Britton v. Commissioner of Social Security, 1:19-cv-0668. (2020)
Court: District Court, N.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20200123f04
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 22, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 22, 2020
Summary: ORDER OF REMAND SARA LIOI , District Judge . Before the Court is the report and recommendation ("R&R") of the magistrate judge in the above entitled action. (Doc. No. 16.) Under the relevant statute: Within fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court. A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findin
Summary: ORDER OF REMAND SARA LIOI , District Judge . Before the Court is the report and recommendation ("R&R") of the magistrate judge in the above entitled action. (Doc. No. 16.) Under the relevant statute: Within fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court. A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed finding..
More
ORDER OF REMAND
SARA LIOI, District Judge.
Before the Court is the report and recommendation ("R&R") of the magistrate judge in the above entitled action. (Doc. No. 16.) Under the relevant statute:
Within fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court. A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made. . . .
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The R&R was filed on January 2, 2020.
On January 6, 2020, the Commissioner of Social Security filed a response indicating that there would be no objection to the magistrate judge's recommendation that the final decision be vacated and the case remanded because the Administrative Law Judge failed to comply with the requirements of the Social Security regulations for weighing medical source evidence.
No objections having been heard, the Court adopts the recommendation, vacates the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, and remands this matter for further proceedings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
