Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Talbert v. Carney, 18-1620. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20190815f26 Visitors: 1
Filed: Aug. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 13, 2019
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 13 th day of August 2019, upon considering Defendants' Motion for summary judgment (ECF Doc. No. 119), Plaintiffs Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 135), and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendants' Motion (ECF Doc. No. 119) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part: 1. Absent Defendants adducing evidence of their reasons for the 2017 placement, we find genuine issues of material fact preclude summary judgment
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 13th day of August 2019, upon considering Defendants' Motion for summary judgment (ECF Doc. No. 119), Plaintiffs Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 135), and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendants' Motion (ECF Doc. No. 119) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part:

1. Absent Defendants adducing evidence of their reasons for the 2017 placement, we find genuine issues of material fact preclude summary judgment on Plaintiffs First Amendment retaliation and procedural due process claims arising from the 2017 placement in administrative segregation; and,

2. We grant summary judgment dismissing Plaintiffs remaining claims relating to substantive due process, access to religious services, and claims seeking to impose supervisory liability on Commissioner Carney and Wardens May and Clark for Officer Ford's alleged retaliation in 2019.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer