Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

LUKENS v. MAUL, 3:15-CV-00512-JE. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Oregon Number: infdco20160518e31 Visitors: 10
Filed: May 16, 2016
Latest Update: May 16, 2016
Summary: ORDER ANNA J. BROWN , District Judge . Magistrate Judge John Jelderks issued Findings and Recommendation (#25) on April 6, 2016, in which he recommends this Court grant Defendant Jamiel Brown's Motion (#20) for Summary Judgment and dismiss this matter with prejudice. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is r
More

ORDER

Magistrate Judge John Jelderks issued Findings and Recommendation (#25) on April 6, 2016, in which he recommends this Court grant Defendant Jamiel Brown's Motion (#20) for Summary Judgment and dismiss this matter with prejudice. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. See Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). See also United States v. Reyna-Tapiam, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks's Findings and Recommendation (#25). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendant Brown's Motion (#20) for Summary Judgment and DISMISSES this matter with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer