Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

KILZI v. BIESSE AMERICA, INC., 3:15-cv-00431-FDW-DCK. (2016)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20160727f72 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 26, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 26, 2016
Summary: ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R") (Doc. No. 16). The M&R recommends allowing Plaintiff to file an amended complaint. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) allows a party fourteen (14) days to file specific written objections to a Magistrate Judge's proposed findings and recommendations. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). By copy of the M&R, each party was advised of the right to file written objections. No objecti
More

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R") (Doc. No. 16). The M&R recommends allowing Plaintiff to file an amended complaint.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) allows a party fourteen (14) days to file specific written objections to a Magistrate Judge's proposed findings and recommendations. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). By copy of the M&R, each party was advised of the right to file written objections. No objections were filed by either party as of the date of this Order.

After a careful review of the record, and finding no error, the Court hereby ADOPTS and APPROVES the findings and recommendations set forth in the M&R. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's "Motion to Amend the Complaint" (Doc. No. 12), and DENIES Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 8), and DENIES Defendant's "Response in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Amend," (Doc. No. 14) as moot because no objections were made to the M&R and the Court adopts the M&R.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer