McKINNIS v. AERO FULFILLMENT, 1:15cv129. (2015)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20151207f27
Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 04, 2015
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on November 12, 2015 (Doc. 14), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired November 30, 2015, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, defendant's motion to dismiss (Doc
Summary: ORDER SUSAN J. DLOTT , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on November 12, 2015 (Doc. 14), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired November 30, 2015, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, defendant's motion to dismiss (Doc...
More
ORDER
SUSAN J. DLOTT, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on November 12, 2015 (Doc. 14), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired November 30, 2015, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, defendant's motion to dismiss (Doc. 9) is GRANTED in part. To the extent that plaintiff has raised claims under Title VII, such claims are DISMISSED. Defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's claims under the ADA are DENIED. Plaintiff is permitted to file an amended complaint as to her ADA claims including supporting factual allegations.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
