Delgado v. U.S., 2:17-cr-119. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20190313d07
Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2019
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER MICHAEL H. WATSON , District Judge . On February 14, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), EOF No. 41, recommendihg that the motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255, EOF No. 40, which was construed as a motion made under 28 U.S.C 2241, be dismissed without prejudice because this Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain Movant's claim. Although the parties were advised of the rightto object to the R&R, and of the consequences of failing to
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER MICHAEL H. WATSON , District Judge . On February 14, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), EOF No. 41, recommendihg that the motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255, EOF No. 40, which was construed as a motion made under 28 U.S.C 2241, be dismissed without prejudice because this Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain Movant's claim. Although the parties were advised of the rightto object to the R&R, and of the consequences of failing to ..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
MICHAEL H. WATSON, District Judge.
On February 14, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), EOF No. 41, recommendihg that the motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, EOF No. 40, which was construed as a motion made under 28 U.S.C § 2241, be dismissed without prejudice because this Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain Movant's claim. Although the parties were advised of the rightto object to the R&R, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. The R&R, ECF No. 41, is therefore, ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. This action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
