MARTINEZ v. ASTRUE, 12-4348. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20130531f59
Visitors: 24
Filed: May 30, 2013
Latest Update: May 30, 2013
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, District Judge. AND NOW, this 30th day of May, 2013, upon consideration of the Plaintiff's Motion in Support of Request for Review (Document No. 9), the defendant's response, the plaintiff's reply, and after a careful and thorough review of the entire record, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff's request for review is GRANTED insofar as it requests that the matter be vacated and remanded; and 2. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner, pursuant to sent
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, District Judge. AND NOW, this 30th day of May, 2013, upon consideration of the Plaintiff's Motion in Support of Request for Review (Document No. 9), the defendant's response, the plaintiff's reply, and after a careful and thorough review of the entire record, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff's request for review is GRANTED insofar as it requests that the matter be vacated and remanded; and 2. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner, pursuant to sente..
More
ORDER
TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 30th day of May, 2013, upon consideration of the Plaintiff's Motion in Support of Request for Review (Document No. 9), the defendant's response, the plaintiff's reply, and after a careful and thorough review of the entire record, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. Plaintiff's request for review is GRANTED insofar as it requests that the matter be vacated and remanded; and
2. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further proceedings consistent with the Memorandum Opinion accompanying this Order.
Source: Leagle
