Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Randa v. Barr, 5:18-CV-19-FL. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20191101i59 Visitors: 11
Filed: Oct. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 30, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR STAY LOUISE W. FLANAGAN , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's motion to stay the briefing (DE 85) on Defendant's motion for summary judgment (DE 74). Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6.1(a) and the Court's inherent power to manage its docket, the Motion is GRANTED . This matter is STAYED until resolution of Plaintiff's motion to compel discovery (DE 72). Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file her response to Defendant's motion for summa
More

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR STAY

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's motion to stay the briefing (DE 85) on Defendant's motion for summary judgment (DE 74). Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6.1(a) and the Court's inherent power to manage its docket, the Motion is GRANTED.

This matter is STAYED until resolution of Plaintiff's motion to compel discovery (DE 72). Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file her response to Defendant's motion for summary judgment no later than fourteen (14) days after either (1) U.S. Magistrate Judge James E. Gates enters an order denying Plaintiff's motion to compel discovery, or (2) Defendant William P. Barr complies with an order by Magistrate Judge Gates granting Plaintiff's motion to compel.

It is SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer