Kaisen v. TD Bank, N.A., 18-5504. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20190212c68
Visitors: 10
Filed: Feb. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 11, 2019
Summary: ORDER WENDY BEETLESTONE , District Judge . AND NOW, this 11th day of February, 2019, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and briefing in support thereof (ECF Nos. 6, 15), and Plaintiff's opposition thereto (ECF No. 12), it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as follows: • Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count One is GRANTED. Count One is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. • Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count Two is DENIED. •
Summary: ORDER WENDY BEETLESTONE , District Judge . AND NOW, this 11th day of February, 2019, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and briefing in support thereof (ECF Nos. 6, 15), and Plaintiff's opposition thereto (ECF No. 12), it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as follows: • Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count One is GRANTED. Count One is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. • Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count Two is DENIED. • D..
More
ORDER
WENDY BEETLESTONE, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 11th day of February, 2019, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and briefing in support thereof (ECF Nos. 6, 15), and Plaintiff's opposition thereto (ECF No. 12), it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as follows:
• Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count One is GRANTED. Count One is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
• Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count Two is DENIED.
• Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count Three is GRANTED. Count Three is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Strike and briefing in support thereof (ECF Nos. 7, 14), and Plaintiff's opposition thereto (ECF No. 11), Defendant's Motion is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
