Filed: Aug. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 22, 2019
Summary: ORDER JOEL H. SLOMSKY , District Judge . AND NOW , this 21st day of August 2019, upon consideration of Defendants Siemens Industry, Inc.'s, Siemens Postal, Parcel, and Airport Logistics, LLC's, and Dematic Corp.'s ("Defendants") Motion for Reconsideration of the Order Denying Their Daubert Motion To Preclude Plaintiff's Expert Thomas Cocchiola From Offering Any warning, Safety Communication and Alternative Design Opinions At Trial (Doc. No. 51), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition (Doc. No.
Summary: ORDER JOEL H. SLOMSKY , District Judge . AND NOW , this 21st day of August 2019, upon consideration of Defendants Siemens Industry, Inc.'s, Siemens Postal, Parcel, and Airport Logistics, LLC's, and Dematic Corp.'s ("Defendants") Motion for Reconsideration of the Order Denying Their Daubert Motion To Preclude Plaintiff's Expert Thomas Cocchiola From Offering Any warning, Safety Communication and Alternative Design Opinions At Trial (Doc. No. 51), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition (Doc. No. ..
More
ORDER
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 21st day of August 2019, upon consideration of Defendants Siemens Industry, Inc.'s, Siemens Postal, Parcel, and Airport Logistics, LLC's, and Dematic Corp.'s ("Defendants") Motion for Reconsideration of the Order Denying Their Daubert Motion To Preclude Plaintiff's Expert Thomas Cocchiola From Offering Any warning, Safety Communication and Alternative Design Opinions At Trial (Doc. No. 51), Plaintiff's Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 58), and Defendants' Reply (Doc. No. 60), it is ORDERED in accordance with the Opinion issued by the Court on this day that Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 51) is DENIED.
