Dau Thi Ha v. Berryhill, 16-3484. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20180216c88
Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 14, 2018
Summary: ORDER BERLE M. SCHILLER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 14 day of Feb , 2018, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review (Dkt. No. 8) filed November 19, 2016; upon consideration of Defendant's Response to Request for Review of Plaintiff (Dkt. No. 9) filed December 21, 2016; upon consideration of Plaintiffs Reply Brief (Dkt. No. 11) filed January 1, 2017; and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Summary: ORDER BERLE M. SCHILLER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 14 day of Feb , 2018, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review (Dkt. No. 8) filed November 19, 2016; upon consideration of Defendant's Response to Request for Review of Plaintiff (Dkt. No. 9) filed December 21, 2016; upon consideration of Plaintiffs Reply Brief (Dkt. No. 11) filed January 1, 2017; and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate J..
More
ORDER
BERLE M. SCHILLER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 14 day of Feb, 2018, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review (Dkt. No. 8) filed November 19, 2016; upon consideration of Defendant's Response to Request for Review of Plaintiff (Dkt. No. 9) filed December 21, 2016; upon consideration of Plaintiffs Reply Brief (Dkt. No. 11) filed January 1, 2017; and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin dated January 29, 2018. Objections thereto.
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. the Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. the relief sought by Plaintiff is DENIED; and
3. the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED.
FootNotes
1. On January 23, 2017, Nancy A. Berryhill became the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and, therefore, she should be automatically substituted as the Defendant in this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d).
Source: Leagle
