Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Arbitman v. Berryhill, 18-cv-51. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20190401g51 Visitors: 16
Filed: Mar. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 29, 2019
Summary: ORDER JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 2019, upon careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, and Plaintiff's Objections thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's Objections [Doc. 11] are SUSTAINED . 2. The Report and Recommendation [Doc. 10] is not approved and adopted. 3. The Plaintiff's Request for Review [Doc. 6] is GRANTED . 4. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the P
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 2019, upon careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, and Plaintiff's Objections thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's Objections [Doc. 11] are SUSTAINED. 2. The Report and Recommendation [Doc. 10] is not approved and adopted. 3. The Plaintiff's Request for Review [Doc. 6] is GRANTED. 4. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant, the Commissioner of Social Security Administration. 5. The Commissioner's decision is VACATED and this matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner with instructions to conduct a new administrative hearing, develop the record fully, and evaluate the evidence appropriately in accordance with the Court's Memorandum. 6. The Clerk is DIRECTED to mark this case closed.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer