Filed: Jan. 11, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 11, 2012
Summary: DECISION and ORDER CHARLES J. SIRAGUSA, District Judge. This case was referred by order of the undersigned, docketed May 2, 2011 (Docket # 2), to Magistrate Judge Marian W. Payson, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A)-(B). On August 1, 2011, Defendant filed an omnibus motion (Docket # 58) seeking various forms of relief, including a request for the suppression of statements, as well as a hearing in that regard. As to the suppression of statements, on November 21, 2011, Magistrate Judge Payson
Summary: DECISION and ORDER CHARLES J. SIRAGUSA, District Judge. This case was referred by order of the undersigned, docketed May 2, 2011 (Docket # 2), to Magistrate Judge Marian W. Payson, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A)-(B). On August 1, 2011, Defendant filed an omnibus motion (Docket # 58) seeking various forms of relief, including a request for the suppression of statements, as well as a hearing in that regard. As to the suppression of statements, on November 21, 2011, Magistrate Judge Payson f..
More
DECISION and ORDER
CHARLES J. SIRAGUSA, District Judge.
This case was referred by order of the undersigned, docketed May 2, 2011 (Docket # 2), to Magistrate Judge Marian W. Payson, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A)-(B). On August 1, 2011, Defendant filed an omnibus motion (Docket # 58) seeking various forms of relief, including a request for the suppression of statements, as well as a hearing in that regard. As to the suppression of statements, on November 21, 2011, Magistrate Judge Payson filed a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") (Docket # 94) recommending that the Court deny Defendant's motion to suppress, since the request was not supported by an affidavit on the part of a person with knowledge. The time has passed for Defendant to file any objections to the R&R, and none have been filed.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Payson's R&R, Defendant's application to suppress statements is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
