Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Moore v. Carolina Meadows, Inc., 1:19CV308. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20190607844 Visitors: 19
Filed: May 20, 2019
Latest Update: May 20, 2019
Summary: RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOI ELIZABETH PEAKE , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiff's Motion [Doc. #12] for Voluntary Dismissal of Count 1 of her Complaint. Defendant previously filed a Motion to Dismiss [Doc. #2] as to Count 1, and rather than filing a Response to the Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff filed the present Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of Count 1, seeking dismissal with prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs. Defe
More

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiff's Motion [Doc. #12] for Voluntary Dismissal of Count 1 of her Complaint. Defendant previously filed a Motion to Dismiss [Doc. #2] as to Count 1, and rather than filing a Response to the Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff filed the present Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of Count 1, seeking dismissal with prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs. Defendant has not filed an opposition to the Motion for Voluntary Dismissal, and the Motion has been referred to the Court as unopposed. Given the early stage of the proceedings and the posture of the case, the Court will recommend that Plaintiff Motion for Voluntary Dismissal [Doc. #12] be granted, that Count 1 be deemed dismissed with prejudice with each side to bear their own costs, that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count 1 [Doc. #2] be denied as moot, and that this case proceed as to Count 2 (Plaintiff's Family Medical Leave Act claim) pursuant to the Scheduling Order previously adopted in this case.

IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's Motion for Voluntary Dismissal [Doc. #12] be granted, that Count 1 be deemed dismissed with prejudice with each side to bear their own costs, that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count 1 [Doc. #2] be denied as moot, and that this case proceed as to Count 2 pursuant to the Scheduling Order previously adopted in this case.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer