Snider v. Pennsylvania Dept. of Corrections, 15-951. (2019)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20191206952
Visitors: 13
Filed: Dec. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 02, 2019
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 2 nd day of December 2019, upon considering the pro se Plaintiff's "First Combined Motion to Make Sept. 30, 2019 Memorandum Order Appealable and for Extension of Time to Submit Petition for Permission to Appeal" (ECF Doc. No. 344), failing to demonstrate exceptional circumstances to justify piecemeal litigation through an interlocutory appeal, and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED the pro se Plaintiff's
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 2 nd day of December 2019, upon considering the pro se Plaintiff's "First Combined Motion to Make Sept. 30, 2019 Memorandum Order Appealable and for Extension of Time to Submit Petition for Permission to Appeal" (ECF Doc. No. 344), failing to demonstrate exceptional circumstances to justify piecemeal litigation through an interlocutory appeal, and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED the pro se Plaintiff's M..
More
ORDER
MARK A. KEARNEY, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 2nd day of December 2019, upon considering the pro se Plaintiff's "First Combined Motion to Make Sept. 30, 2019 Memorandum Order Appealable and for Extension of Time to Submit Petition for Permission to Appeal" (ECF Doc. No. 344), failing to demonstrate exceptional circumstances to justify piecemeal litigation through an interlocutory appeal, and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED the pro se Plaintiff's Motion (ECF Doc. No. 344) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
