DUGAN v. STARRETT, 2:12-cv-811. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20141104a30
Visitors: 7
Filed: Nov. 03, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 03, 2014
Summary: ORDER GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge. On October 31, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice of all claims against Central Ohio Drug Task Force. (ECF No. 90.) Plaintiffs purport to take this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41; however, the Sixth Circuit has held that Rule 41 is confined to the dismissal of an entire action and cannot provide a mechanism through which select parties or claims can be dismissed. Letherer v. Alger Group, L.L.C.,
Summary: ORDER GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge. On October 31, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice of all claims against Central Ohio Drug Task Force. (ECF No. 90.) Plaintiffs purport to take this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41; however, the Sixth Circuit has held that Rule 41 is confined to the dismissal of an entire action and cannot provide a mechanism through which select parties or claims can be dismissed. Letherer v. Alger Group, L.L.C., ..
More
ORDER
GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge.
On October 31, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice of all claims against Central Ohio Drug Task Force. (ECF No. 90.) Plaintiffs purport to take this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41; however, the Sixth Circuit has held that Rule 41 is confined to the dismissal of an entire action and cannot provide a mechanism through which select parties or claims can be dismissed. Letherer v. Alger Group, L.L.C., 328 F.3d 262, 266 (6th Cir. 2003), recognized as overruled on other grounds in Blackburn v. Oaktree Capital Mgmt., LLC, 511 F.3d 633, 636 (6th Cir. 2008); see also AmSouth Bank v. Dale, 386 F.3d 763, 778 (6th Cir. 2004) (citing Letherer); Coleman v. Ohio State Univ. Med. Ctr., No. 2:11-cv-49, 2011 WL 3273531, at *6 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 1, 2011).
Recognizing that filings are to be construed by their substantive content and not by their labels, the Court will construe the motion as one under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21. This Court, therefore, GRANTS the motion and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE all claims against Defendant Central Ohio Drug Task Force.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
