Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

L.I.S. Transport LLC v. Navistar, Inc., 2:19-cv-57. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20190416f06 Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 15, 2019
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL H. WATSON , District Judge . On March 28, 2019, Magistrate Judge Vascura issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), ECF No. 14, regarding Plaintiff's motion to remand, ECF No. 9. Magistrate Judge Vascura recommended that the motion to remand be GRANTED. R&R 6, ECF No. 14. Magistrate Judge Vascura notified the parties of their right to file objections to the R&R pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Id. at 7. She also specifically advised the parties that the failure to obj
More

ORDER

On March 28, 2019, Magistrate Judge Vascura issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), ECF No. 14, regarding Plaintiff's motion to remand, ECF No. 9. Magistrate Judge Vascura recommended that the motion to remand be GRANTED. R&R 6, ECF No. 14.

Magistrate Judge Vascura notified the parties of their right to file objections to the R&R pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Id. at 7. She also specifically advised the parties that the failure to object to the R&R within fourteen days would result In a waiver of both the right to de novo review bythe District Judge and the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the R&R. Id. at 6-7.

The deadline for filing such objections has passed, and no objections were filed. Having received no objections, the R&R is ADOPTED. Plaintiff's motion to remand, ECF No. 9, is GRANTED consistent with the R&R. This matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas for Licking County, Ohio.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer