ORDER

GEORGE C. SMITH, District Judge.

On January 19, 2016, the United States Magistrate Judge issued an Order and Initial Screen Report and Recommendation recommending that Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis be granted and that Plaintiff's Complaint against Defendants The Ohio State University and Hoffherr be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii) as frivolous and failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (See Report and Recommendation, Doc. 13). The parties were advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation. This matter is now before the Court on Plaintiff Martiquea Middleton's Objections to the Order and Report and Recommendation. (See Doc. 15). The Court will consider the matter de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).

Plaintiff has included some more detailed factual allegations than initially included in her Complaint, however, the factual allegations do not provide any basis to overcome Defendants' sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment. Plaintiff's objections merely present the same issues presented to and considered by the Magistrate Judge in the Report and Recommendation. These general objections are not sufficient to preserve any issues for reviews, and "[a] general objection to the entirety of the magistrate's report has the same effects as would a failure to objection." Howard v. Sec'y of H.H.S., 932 F.2d 505, 509 (6th Cir. 1991). For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, this Court finds that Plaintiff's Objections are without merit and are hereby OVERRULED.

The Reports and Recommendation, Document 13, is hereby ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby dismissed.

The Clerk shall remove Documents 12, 13, and 15 from the Court's pending motions list. The Clerk shall terminate this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.