Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Aziz of Family of Jalal v. Ohio Office of Child Support, 2:18-cv-25. (2018)

Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio Number: infdco20180427h18 Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER GEORGE C. SMITH , District Judge . On March 26, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge issued an Opinion and Order ordering that Defendants' Motions to Vacate Entry of Default be granted and Plaintiff's Motions for Default Judgment be denied. ( See Doc. 16). The parties were advised of their right to object to the Opinion and Order. This matter is now before the Court on Plaintiff's Objections. ( See Doc. 17). Defendants have each filed a response. (Docs. 20 and 21). The Court re
More

ORDER

On March 26, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge issued an Opinion and Order ordering that Defendants' Motions to Vacate Entry of Default be granted and Plaintiff's Motions for Default Judgment be denied. (See Doc. 16). The parties were advised of their right to object to the Opinion and Order. This matter is now before the Court on Plaintiff's Objections. (See Doc. 17). Defendants have each filed a response. (Docs. 20 and 21). The Court reviews de novo those portions of the Opinion and Order to which an objection has been made. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). De novo review in these circumstances requires at least a review of the evidence before the magistrate judge; the Court may not act solely on the basis of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation. Hill v. Duriron Co., 656 F.2d 1208, 1215 (6th Cir. 1981).

Plaintiff objects to the Magistrate Judge's order setting aside the default judgment in his favor against the Franklin County Child Support Enforcement Agency ("FCCSEA"). He asserts that he properly served both Defendants and received a lawful entry of default judgment. Further, he argues that FCCSEA does not have a meritorious defense and the motion to set aside default judgment should therefore be denied. Both Defendants have filed responses asserting that Plaintiff's objections merely state disagreement with the Magistrate Judge's conclusions, but fails to raise arguments showing how the conclusions are contrary to law. Further, Defendant Ohio Department of Job and Family Services, Office of Child Support ("OCS"), argues that Plaintiff has not raised any objections with respect to the Order granting its Motion to Vacate Entry of Default and therefore it should be adopted and affirmed.

The Court has considered Plaintiff's objection and agrees with the well-reasoned decision of the Magistrate Judge that there is good cause to set aside the entries of default. Plaintiff will not be prejudiced as this case is still in the early stages. Further, Defendants have asserted several viable defenses. Therefore, the Court finds that the entries of default are hereby set aside. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Opinion and Order are overruled.

For the reasons stated above, the Magistrate Judge's Opinion and Order is hereby ADOPTED AND AFFIRMED. Defendants' Motions to Vacate the Entries of Default are GRANTED and Plaintiff's Motions for Default Judgment are DENIED.

The Clerk shall remove Documents 10, 11, 14, 15, and 17 from the Court's pending motions list.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer