Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Thomas v. Mahally, 17-5477. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20190304a29 Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 01, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2019
Summary: ORDER GERALD J. PAPPERT , District Judge . AND NOW , this 1st day of March, 2019, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells, (ECF No. 10), and it appearing that the petitioner has not objected to the report, 1 it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED and 2. The petition is DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing. FootNotes 1. When no objection is made to a R
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 1st day of March, 2019, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells, (ECF No. 10), and it appearing that the petitioner has not objected to the report,1 it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED and

2. The petition is DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing.

FootNotes


1. When no objection is made to a Report and Recommendation, the Court should, as a matter of good practice, "satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee notes; see also Oldrati v. Apfel, 33 F.Supp.2d 397, 399 (E.D. Pa. 1998). No clear error appears on the face of the record and the Court accordingly accepts Judge Wells' Recommendation.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer