Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

SCHWARTZ v. ACCURATUS CORPORATION, 12-6189. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20140428713 Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 25, 2014
Summary: ORDER JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL, District Judge. AND NOW , this 24 th day of March, 2014, upon consideration of the Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendant Materion Brush Inc. (Docket #50) and Defendant Accuratus Corportation (Docket #55) and all supporting and opposing papers, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motions are GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. Accuratus Corporation's Motion to Dismiss (Docket #55) is GRANTED with respect to Count I, and Count I is DISMISSED WITH PREJU
More

ORDER

JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 24th day of March, 2014, upon consideration of the Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendant Materion Brush Inc. (Docket #50) and Defendant Accuratus Corportation (Docket #55) and all supporting and opposing papers, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motions are GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:

1. Accuratus Corporation's Motion to Dismiss (Docket #55) is GRANTED with respect to Count I, and Count I is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

2. Accuratus Corporation's Motion to Dismiss (Docket #55) is DENIED with respect to Count II.

3. Accuratus Corporation's Motion to Dismiss (Docket #55) is GRANTED with respect to Count III, and Count III is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

4. Accuratus Corporation's Motion to Dismiss (Docket #55) is GRANTED with respect to Count IV, and Count IV is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

5. Materion Brush's Motion to Dismiss (Docket #50) is DENIED with respect to Count V.

6. Materion Brush's Motion to Dismiss (Docket #50) is DENIED with respect to Count VI.

7. Materion Brush's Motion to Dismiss (Docket #50) is GRANTED with respect to Count VII, and Count VII is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

8. Materion Brush's Motion to Dismiss (Docket #50) is DENIED with respect to Count VIII.

9. The Motions of both Defendants (Docket ##50 and #55) are DENIED with respect to Count IX.

10. The Motions of both Defendants (Docket ##50 and #55) are DENIED with respect to Count X.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer