Snider v. Commissioner of Social Security, 3:16-cv-02236-JR. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Oregon
Number: infdco20180312c99
Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 09, 2018
Summary: ORDER ANN AIKEN , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Jolie Russo filed her Findings and Recommendation ("F&R") on 1/08/2018 (doc. 29) recommending that the decision of the Commissioner be reversed and remanded for further proceedings. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's F&R, the district court must make a de nova determination of that portion of the magistrate judge's report.
Summary: ORDER ANN AIKEN , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Jolie Russo filed her Findings and Recommendation ("F&R") on 1/08/2018 (doc. 29) recommending that the decision of the Commissioner be reversed and remanded for further proceedings. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's F&R, the district court must make a de nova determination of that portion of the magistrate judge's report. ..
More
ORDER
ANN AIKEN, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Jolie Russo filed her Findings and Recommendation ("F&R") on 1/08/2018 (doc. 29) recommending that the decision of the Commissioner be reversed and remanded for further proceedings. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's F&R, the district court must make a de nova determination of that portion of the magistrate judge's report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982).
Plaintiff filed timely objections to the F&R (doc. 34), and the Commissioner has filed a response to those objections (doc. 35). Thus, I review the F&R de nova.
Having reviewed the record and the F&R de nova, I find no error in Judge Russo's reasoning.
Thus, I adopt Magistrate Judge Russo's F&R (doc. 29) in its entirety. Accordingly, the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the F&R and this order. This case is DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
